Pontificia
Universidad Javeriana
Enseñanza de Lengua extranjera
By: Brian Martin
Enseñanza de Lengua extranjera
By: Brian Martin
In the context of globalization and because of
Colombian policies, the Ministerio de
Educación Nacional formulated the Programa
Nacional de Bilinguismo 2004-2009, which includes the new standards of
communicative competences of foreign languages – English-, which pretends that
in the year 2019 the total population of Colombia achieves a development of
bilingual competence. So does the Cafam
school, which proposal is to bring up people with the capacity to face up the
challenges worldwide; this program came into effect in 2011 with the second
phase of the bilingualism project.
For Cafam School, being bilingual means being capable
of using two languages with different purposes, in different fields and varied
levels of abilities. The bilingualism
model at Cafam is supported for four principles derived from concepts and
researches towards bilingualism, bilingual education and bialphabetism.
How?
Cafam stated that education first in the mother
language. Because of some researches that have shown the construction of
knowledge is more effective through the mother language, especially in the
early stages of development of bilingualism. That is the reason why Cafam carry
out the whole process first in Spanish so they forwardly can produce the
knowledge in a second language.
Bi-culturalismo: know the English-speaking culture
without granting a privilege to that culture over ours. It is only give them
the possibility to get to know that culture better. This also includes crating
environments of learning, which I found great, because English can only be
learned in real-life situations, Cafam implements reading and writing to reach
that goal.
Context
Cafam school is a very varied school, in the matter
that one may find any socio-economical statues, as the director of bilingualism
said once to me, “here you find the ones who did not have dinner last night,
and the once who had caviar for breakfast”, and I did find that is true. Once
in class, in one of the activities of sharing experiences about traveling,
working, future, the discourse is again varied, some talk about have been in
Europe having lunch in Paris, some talk about swimming in Colombian rivers as
the funniest trip they’ve done during their lives. Another example I have seen,
there was an activity in which students must show a receipt and make it in
front of the class, some barely carried out the activity with some fruits, or
sandwiches with jam and bread, and others made a banana split with nutella and
not cheap ingredients.
What I’ve actually seen in classes is that none of
these socio-economical positions play an important role in the matter of
students interactions, they seem like they do not care about who has more or
less, they treat equally each other, and that, in this unequally country Is a
sign of hope on humanity.
What really do influence the students at Cafam, is the
fact that a low percentage of new students, with a high socio-economic status,
come from expensive bilingual schools, so that makes a big difference on the
process of each class, because as it is said at the beginning of this research,
they are just implementing the common European framework for languages at the
school. No matter what, these students have to stick to the level the class is
going through, because the majority is in a low level of the language, and
little by little they will implement a system in which the students can be in
an appropriate level.
At Cafam, while my staying; the students took a test
that measures the level and proves if students are in the right level for their
grade. In the case of my grades, the took the KET test, and it seemed to be a
little hard for them, five out of 42 just had an almost perfect test, the rest
of them found it hard to do.
To continue, I put a list of fields observed in class
and the analysis make on them.
Language
Teaching: There is a program
stated for each group, the topic once given, is followed by the next by periods
of time, simple present should not take longer than five or six sessions, if
students did not get it, at the end of the semester a little review is given.
The abilities; reading, grammar, listening and speaking, are measured
separately and summed up with activities done in the trimester.
Personality
of students: What is good of
being in two different grades, 6th and 7th, could show me
how hard the human being changes his way of acting, puberty hits very hard and
one can notice it every day, at 6th grade students are more docile
and stick to the rules, they may have problems with the language learning, but
they keep being meek. On the other hand, 7th graders do not care
neither about what is going on the board nor what the teacher is saying, their
word is over teachers. They bow their heads when it comes to subpoenas or
annotations in their records.
Approaches or Methods: I have not seen teachers who
are free to teach in their own way, they are so fidel to the program that
changing anything could scare them. Is that, or I’m wrong and every teacher
teaches as a direct method enthusiast. Teacher commands everything; students
barely talk or participate, just when they’re asked to do so.